A Good Lawyer Knows How To Shut

Yes, Believers And Non-believers And Skeptics Can All Live Together And Get Along. But There Cannot Be An Imperialistic Imposition Of Religion By The State Or By The Church. All People Must Be Equal--believers, Skeptics, Disbelievers, Atheists, And Those Who Chose Religion. Unless We Are All Deemed Equal, And Unless The Morality Of Disbelief Is Deemed The Equivalent Of The Morality Of Belief, We Will Simply Be Tolerated, And That Is Not The American Way.

To Ask About The 'source' Of Rights Or Morals Assumes An Erreous Conclusion. To Ask About The Source Of Morals Is To Assume That Such A Source Exists. As If It Existed Outside Of Human Constructed Systems. The 'source' Is The Human Ability To Learn From Experience And To Entrench Rights In Our Laws And In Our Consciousness. Our Rights Come From Our Long History Of Wrongs.

The Court Of Last Resort Is No Longer The Supreme Court. It's 'nightline.'

I Have Always Considered "pascal's Wager" A Questionable Bet To Place. Any God Worth "believing In" Would Surely Prefer An Honest Agnostic To A Calculating Hypocrite.

Such Technological Tools ... Are Helping Us Now In The Hot War Against Terrorists Who Would Bomb This Theater If They Had The Capacity To Do So.