A Law Can Be Both Economic Folly

Who Ever Thought That Intimacy And Spirituality [whatever That Means] Were Freedoms? And If Intimacy Is, One Would Think Freedom Of Intimacy Is Abridged Rather Than Expanded By Marriage. Ask The Nearest Hippie.

Nowhere Else In The Constitution Does A "right" Attributed To "the People" Refer To Anything Other Than An Individual Right. What Is More, In All Six Other Provisions Of The Constitution That Mention "the People," The Term Unambiguously Refers To All Members Of The Political Community, Not An Unspecified Subset... The Second Amendment Extends, Prima Facie, To All Instruments That Constitute Bearable Arms... The Very Text Of The Second Amendment Implicitly Recognizes The Pre-existence Of The Right And Declares Only That It "shall Not Be Infringed."

To Be Honest About It, That Is The View Of Christians Taken By Modern Society. Surely Those Who Adhere To All Or Most Of These Traditional Christian Beliefs Are To Be Regarded As Simpleminded.

As Long As Judges Tinker With The Constitution To 'do What The People Want,' Instead Of What The Document Actually Commands, Politicians Who Pick And Confirm New Federal Judges Will Naturally Want Only Those Who Agree With Them Politically.

In A Big Family The First Child Is Kind Of Like The First Pancake. If It's Not Perfect, That's Okay, There Are A Lot More Coming Along.