Art Attests To What Is Inhuman In

Art Is Not Ideology. It Is Completely Impossible To Explain Art On The Basis Of The Homological Relation That It Is Supposed To Maintain With The Real Of History. The Aesthetic Process Decentres The Specular Relation With Which Ideology Perpetuates Its Closed Infinity. The Aesthetic Effect Is Certainly Imaginary; But This Imaginary Is Not The Reflection Of The Real, Since It Is The Real Of This Reflection.

It Must Be Said That Today, At The End Of Its Semantic Evolution, The Word 'terrorist' Is An Intrinsically Propagandistic Term. It Has No Neutral Readability. It Dispenses With All Reasoned Examination Of Political Situations, Of Their Causes And Consequences.

I Would Say, If You Like, That The Party Is Like An Out-moded Mathematics...that Is To Say, The Mathematics Of Euclid. We Need To Invent A Non-euclidian Mathematics With Respect To Political Discipline.

We Must Point Out That In What Concerns Its Material The Event Is Not A Miracle. What I Mean Is That What Composes An Event Is Always Extracted From A Situation, Always Related Back To A Singular Multiplicity, To Its State, To The Language That Is Connected To It, Etc. In Fact, So As Not To Succumb To An Obscurantist Theory Of Creation Ex Nihilo, We Must Accept That An Event Is Nothing But A Part Of A Given Situation, Nothing But A Fragment Of Being.

Evil Is The Interruption Of A Truth By The Pressure Of Particular Or Individual Interests.