Certainly One Cannot Ban Cross Burning In

The Virtue Of A Democratic System With A [constitutionally Guaranteed Right To Free Speech] Is That It Readily Enables The People, Over Time, To Be Persuaded That What They Took For Granted Is Not So, And To Change Their Laws Accordingly.

It Would Be Gross Understatement To Say That The Telecommunications Act Of 1996 Is Not A Model Of Clarity. It Is In Many Important Respects A Model Of Ambiguity Or Indeed Even Self-contradiction.

Day By Day, Case By Case, The Supreme Court Is Busy Designing A Constitution For A Country I Do Not Recognize.

The Mere Possession Of Monopoly Power, And The Concomitant Charging Of Monopoly Prices, Is Not Only Not Unlawful, It Is An Important Element Of The Free-market System. The Opportunity To Charge Monopoly Prices - At Least For A Short Period - Is What Attracts 'business Acumen' In The First Place; It Induces Risk Taking That Produces Innovation And Economic Growth.

Why In The World Would You Have It Interpreted By Nine Lawyers?