I Insist Upon The View That 'all

An Animal That Embarks On Forming States Without Greatly Restricting Egoism Will Perish.

It Seems Plain And Self-evident, Yet It Needs To Be Said: The Isolated Knowledge Obtained By A Group Of Specialists In A Narrow Field Has In Itself No Value Whatsoever, But Only In Its Synthesis With All The Rest Of Knowledge And Only Inasmuch As It Really Contributes In This Synthesis Toward Answering The Demand, "who Are We?"

Consciousness Is Never Experienced In The Plural, Only In The Singular. Not Only Has None Of Us Ever Experienced More Than One Consciousness, But There Is Also No Trace Of Circumstantial Evidence Of This Ever Happening Anywhere In The World. If I Say That There Cannot Be More Than One Consciousness In The Same Mind, This Seems A Blunt Tautology - We Are Quite Unable To Imagine The Contrary...

Whence Come I And Whither Go I? That Is The Great Unfathomable Question. Science Has No Answer To It.

In Darwin's Theory, You Just Have To Substitute 'mutations' For His 'slight Accidental Variations' (just As Quantum Theory Substitutes 'quantum Jump' For 'continuous Transfer Of Energy'). In All Other Respects Little Change Was Necessary In Darwin's Theory...