I Insist Upon The View That 'all

Consciousness Is Never Experienced In The Plural, Only In The Singular. Not Only Has None Of Us Ever Experienced More Than One Consciousness, But There Is Also No Trace Of Circumstantial Evidence Of This Ever Happening Anywhere In The World. If I Say That There Cannot Be More Than One Consciousness In The Same Mind, This Seems A Blunt Tautology - We Are Quite Unable To Imagine The Contrary...

Whence Came I, Whither Go I? Science Cannot Tell Us A Word About Why Music Delights Us, Of Why And How An Old Song Can Move Us To Tears. Science Is Reticent Too When It Is A Question Of The Great Unity – The One Of Parmenides – Of Which We All Somehow Form Part, To Which We Belong. The Most Popular Name For It In Our Time Is God – With A Capital ‘g’. Whence Come I And Whither Go I? That Is The Great Unfathomable Question, The Same For Every One Of Us. Science Has No Answer To It.

The Multiplicity Is Only Apparent. This Is The Doctrine Of The Upanishads. And Not Of The Upanishads Only. The Mystical Experience Of The Union With God Regularly Leads To This View, Unless Strong Prejudices Stand In The Way.

Consciousness Cannot Be Accounted For In Physical Terms. For Consciousness Is Absolutely Fundamental. It Cannot Be Accounted For In Terms Of Anything Else.

If You Cannot - In The Long Run - Tell Everyone What You Have Been Doing, Your Doing Has Been Worthless.