If Journalism Is Good, It Is Controversial,

Facebook In Particular Is The Most Appalling Spying Machine That Has Ever Been Invented. Here We Have The World's Most Comprehensive Database About People, Their Relationships, Their Names, Their Addresses, Their Locations And The Communications With Each Other, Their Relatives, All Sitting Within The United States, All Accessible To Us Intelligence. Facebook, Google, Yahoo.. All These Major Us Organizations Have Built-in Interfaces For Us Intelligence. It's Not A Matter Of Serving A Subpoena. They Have An Interface That They Have Developed For Us Intelligence To Use.

If Journalism Is Good, It Is Controversial, By Its Nature.

Wikileaks Does Not Publish From The Jurisdiction Of Ecuador, From This Embassy Or In The Territory Of Ecuador; We Publish From France, We Publish From, From Germany, We Publish From The Netherlands And From A Number Of Other Countries, So That The Attempted Squeeze On Wikileaks Is Through My Refugee Status; And This Is, This Is Really Intolerable. [it Means] That [they] Are Trying To Get At A Publishing Organisation; [they] Try And Prevent It From Publishing True Information That Is Of Intense Interest To The American People And Others About An Election.

That's A Problem. I Mean, Like Any Sort Of Growing Startup Organization, We Are Sort Of Overwhelmed By Our Growth, And That Means We're Getting Enormous Quantity Of Whistleblower Disclosures Of A Very High Caliber But Don't Have Enough People To Actually Process And Vet This Information.

The West Has Fiscalised Its Basic Power Relationships Through A Web Of Contracts, Loans, Shareholdings, Bank Holdings And So On. In Such An Environment It Is Easy For Speech To Be "free" Because A Change In Political Will Rarely Leads To Any Change In These Basic Instruments. Western Speech, As Something That Rarely Has Any Effect On Power, Is, Like Badgers And Birds, Free.