In Celan's Words A Jew Is "a

For One To Be Free There Must Be At Least Two. Freedom Signifies A Social Relation, An Asymmetry Of Social Conditions: Essentially It Implies Social Difference--it Presumes And Implies The Presence Of Social Division. Some Can Be Free Only In So Far As There Is A Form Of Dependence They Can Aspire To Escape.

At The Turn Of The Twenty-first Century, The Richest 5 Percent Of People Receive One-third Of Total Global Income, As Much As The Poorest 80 Percent.

Freedom Without Security Portends Chaos, Perpetual Anxiety And Fear. Security Without Freedom Means Slavery. So, Each On Its Own Is Awful; Only Together They Make For A Good Life. But, A Big "but": Being Both Necessary, Complementing Each Other, They Are Nevertheless Virtually Incompatible.

I Suspect That The Peer-review System Carries A Good Part Of Blame For The Fact That Something Like Sixty Percent Or More Of Journal Articles Are Never Quoted (which Means Leaving No Trace On Our Joint Scholarly Pursuits), And (in My Reception At Any Rate) The "learned Journals" (with A Few Miraculous Exceptions That Entail, Prominently, Tcs) Ooze Monumental Boredom.

The Rationality Of The Ruled Is Always The Weapon Of The Rulers.