Life On Earth Is More Like A

Neo-darwinian Language And Conceptual Structure Itself Ensures Scientific Failure: Major Questions Posed By Zoologists Cannot Be Answered From Inside The Neo-darwinian Straitjacket. Such Questions Include, For Example, 'how Do New Structures Arise In Evolution?' 'why, Given So Much Environmental Change, Is Stasis So Prevalent In Evolution As Seen In The Fossil Record?' 'how Did One Group Of Organisms Or Set Of Macromolecules Evolve From Another?' The Importance Of These Questions Is Not At Issue; It Is Just That Neo-darwinians, Restricted By Their Resuppositions, Cannot Answer Them.

Although Random Mutations Influenced The Course Of Evolution, Their Influence Was Mainly By Loss, Alteration, And Refinement... Never, However, Did That One Mutation Make A Wing, A Fruit, A Woody Stem, Or A Claw Appear. Mutations, In Summary, Tend To Induce Sickness, Death, Or Deficiencies. No Evidence In The Vast Literature Of Heredity Changes Shows Unambiguous Evidence That Random Mutation Itself, Even With Geographical Isolation Of Populations, Leads To Speciation.

Everybody Knows What A Caterpillar Is, And It Doesn't Look Anything Like A Butterfly.

The Accumulation Of Genetic Mutations Were Touted To Be Enough To Change One Species To Another….no. It Wasn’t Dishonesty. I Think It Was Wish Fulfillment And Social Momentum. Assumptions, Made But Not Verified, Were Taught As Fact.

Life On Earth Is More Like A Verb. It Repairs, Maintains, Re-creates, And Outdoes Itself.