My Politics Would Be, Must Be, Have

Perhaps Most Important, Judges Will Have Goals. And Because This Is So, Judges Will Often Try To Mold And Steer The Law In Order To Promote Certain Ethical Values And Achieve Certain Social Ends. Such Activity Is Not Necessarily Wrong Or Invalid.

If There Is An ‘overabundance’ Of An Idea In The Absence Of Direct Governmental Action - Which There Well Might Be When Compared With Some Ideal State Of Public Debate - Then Action Disfavoring That Idea Might ‘un-skew,’ Rather Than Skew, Public Discourse.

Like All Jews, I Was Probably At A Chinese Restaurant!

I Do Not Espouse The Unitarian Position. President Clinton's Assertion Of Directive Authority Over Administration, More Than President Reagan's Assertion Of A General Supervisory Authority, Raises Serious Constitutional Questions.

I Think People Are Great In Many Different Ways. So, I Think Some Justices Are Great Because They Have Extraordinary Wisdom, They Have An Understanding Of How To Apply The Law In Their Times In A Way That's Completely Consistent With The Text Of The Law And The Purposes Of The Law, And In A Way That's Completely Right For The Times In Which They Live In.