"uncertainty" Is Not "i Don't Know." It

[t]he Atoms Or Elementary Particles Themselves Are Not Real; They Form A World Of Potentialities Or Possibilities Rather Than One Of Things Or Facts.

It Is Probably True Quite Generally That In The History Of Human Thinking The Most Fruitful Developments Frequently Take Place At Those Points Where Two Different Lines Of Thought Meet. These Lines May Have Their Roots In Quite Different Parts Of Human Nature, In Different Times Or Different Cultural Environments Or Different Religious Traditions: Hence If They Actually Meet, That Is, If They Are At Least So Much Related To Each Other That A Real Interaction Can Take Place, Then One May Hope That New And Interesting Developments May Follow.

In My Paper The Fact The Xy Was Not Equal To Yx Was Very Disagreeable To Me. I Felt This Was The Only Point Of Difficulty In The Whole Scheme...and I Was Not Able To Solve It.

What We Observe Is Not Nature Itself But Nature Exposed To Our Method Of Questioning. Our Scientific Work In Physics Consists In Asking Questions About Nature In The Language That We Possess And Trying To Get An Answer From Experiment By The Means That Are At Our Disposal.

Whenever We Proceed From The Known To The Unkown We May Hope To Understand, But We May Have To Learn At The Same Time A New Meaning Of The Word 'understanding'