Why Can't The State Accede To The

To Allow The Policy Question Of Same-sex Marriage To Be Considered And Resolved By A Select, Patrician, Highly Unrepresentative Panel Of Nine Is To Violate A Principle Even More Fundamental Than No Taxation Without Representation: No Social Transformation Without Representation.

The Death Penalty? Give Me A Break. It's Easy. Abortion? Absolutely Easy. Nobody Ever Thought The Constitution Prevented Restrictions On Abortion. Homosexual Sodomy? Come On. For 200 Years, It Was Criminal In Every State.

To Be Honest About It, That Is The View Of Christians Taken By Modern Society. Surely Those Who Adhere To All Or Most Of These Traditional Christian Beliefs Are To Be Regarded As Simpleminded.

If, Even As The Price To Be Paid For A Fifth Vote, I Ever Joined An Opinion For The Court That Began: 'the Constitution Promises Liberty To All Within Its Reach, A Liberty That Includes Certain Specific Rights That Allow Persons, Within A Lawful Realm, To Define And Express Their Identity,' I Would Hide My Head In A Bag. The Supreme Court Of The United States Has Descended From The Disciplined Legal Reasoning Of John Marshall And Joseph Story To The Mystical Aphorisms Of The Fortune Cookie.

In A Big Family The First Child Is Kind Of Like The First Pancake. If It's Not Perfect, That's Okay, There Are A Lot More Coming Along.