Law Is Vulnerable To The Winds Of

[the Current Governing Judicial Philosophy Is:] If You Want Something Passionately Enough, It Is Guaranteed By The Constitution. No Need To Fiddle Around Gathering Votes From Recalcitrant Citizens.

No Activity That Society Thinks Immoral Is Victimless. Knowledge That An Activity Is Taking Place Is A Harm To Those Who Find It Profoundly Immoral.

Conservatives . . . May Decide To Join The Game And Seek Activist Judges With Conservative Views. Should That Come To Pass, Those Who Have Tempted The Courts To Political Judging Will Have Gained Nothing For Themselves But Will Have Destroyed A Great And Essential Institution. . . . There Are Only Two Sides. Either The Constitution And Statutes Are Law, Which Means Their Principles Are Known And Control Judges, Or They Are Malleable Texts That Judges May Rewrite To See That Particular Groups Or Political Causes Win.

An Egalitarian Educational System Is Necessarily Opposed To Meritocracy And Reward For Achievement. It Is Inevitably Opposed To Procedures That Might Reveal Differing Levels Of Achievement.

By Depriving The Charged Person Of Any Defenses [the Rulings] Mean That Sexual Dalliance, However Voluntarily Engaged In, Becomes Harassment Whenever An Employee Sees Fit, After The Fact, So To Characterize It.